<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX W3C Standardization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/</link>
	<description>PHP and Other Techno-babble</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3465</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3465</guid>
		<description>I guess other browsers could implement &lt;code&gt;new ActiveXObject()&lt;/code&gt; if they want and not have it actually instantiate an ActiveX object, but I'm pretty sure that Microsoft would have a problem with them using even the name. It belongs to them; it's their IP, so they're likely to protect it and sue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess other browsers could implement <code>new ActiveXObject()</code> if they want and not have it actually instantiate an ActiveX object, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that Microsoft would have a problem with them using even the name. It belongs to them; it&#8217;s their IP, so they&#8217;re likely to protect it and sue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>Where does it say that

new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");

has to use ActiveX on other browsers? Aslong as get something that looks like a XmlHttpRequest object, who cares how its actually implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does it say that</p>
<p>new ActiveXObject(&#8220;Microsoft.XMLHTTP&#8221;);</p>
<p>has to use ActiveX on other browsers? Aslong as get something that looks like a XmlHttpRequest object, who cares how its actually implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>IE7 will support a "native" XMLHttpRequest which you can instantiate the same way you can with Mozilla and Opera. This is less about being compatible with Mozilla and Opera and more about the fact that by doing so users can turn off ActiveX all together, and still have AJAX capabilities :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 will support a &#8220;native&#8221; XMLHttpRequest which you can instantiate the same way you can with Mozilla and Opera. This is less about being compatible with Mozilla and Opera and more about the fact that by doing so users can turn off ActiveX all together, and still have AJAX capabilities :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you back <img src='http://benramsey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Wenz</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Wenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>see also: http://www.hauser-wenz.de/s9y/index.php?/archives/172-XMLHttpRequest-goes-W3C.html
Strangely, Microsoft (as the original inventor of XMLHttpRequest) is not part of the standardization process. Well, at least IE7 does have XMLHttpRequest as a native object, so in a couple of years (well, actually a lot of years) there won't be the need for ActiveX anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see also: <a href="http://www.hauser-wenz.de/s9y/index.php?/archives/172-XMLHttpRequest-goes-W3C.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hauser-wenz.de/s9y/index.php?/archives/172-XMLHttpRequest-goes-W3C.html</a><br />
Strangely, Microsoft (as the original inventor of XMLHttpRequest) is not part of the standardization process. Well, at least IE7 does have XMLHttpRequest as a native object, so in a couple of years (well, actually a lot of years) there won&#8217;t be the need for ActiveX anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3452</guid>
		<description>I've already pointed that out (see the line that says "which was actually the first way of doing it"). The problem with Microsoft's "standard" is that it uses an ActiveX control, which other browsers cannot use because it's proprietary Microsoft technology. Hence the need for a standard that can exist for all browsers that is free from proprietary code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already pointed that out (see the line that says &#8220;which was actually the first way of doing it&#8221;). The problem with Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;standard&#8221; is that it uses an ActiveX control, which other browsers cannot use because it&#8217;s proprietary Microsoft technology. Hence the need for a standard that can exist for all browsers that is free from proprietary code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://benramsey.com/archives/ajax-w3c-standardization/#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benramsey.com/?p=138#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>But Microsoft invented XMLHttpRequest in IE5.0. So they made the standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Microsoft invented XMLHttpRequest in IE5.0. So they made the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
